Skip to main content

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Illinois Medical Grower: Frankin-seeds #4847
    names
    Participant

    2nd generation seeds successfully inherited new traits.

    January 9th the first of the offspring seeds were planted.

    That January 9th plant now displays preflower at node-3.

     

    Mr. Grow It is not going to be taken for a fool is he?

    “Everyone knows that plants only grow in sunlight…

    preflower node 3

    in reply to: Illinois Medical Grower: Frankin-seeds #4743
    names
    Participant

    This claim I am making is hardly getting any responses.

    It was put up in two different Reddit threads, the story

    has been told to three higher tier cannabis culture

    influences(a breeder, a top tier grower and a brand),

    as well as, here on Mr. Grow It.

     

    What obstacles I know exist for a lot of people are risks

    of being taken by fraudulent and fabricated claims, the

    distasteful aspect of believing something that turns out to

    have been nothing more than hype and manifestations of

    grander delusion, and what is now still a prohibited plant

    in the United States, but why so little press…

     

    I am a new grower.

     

    However, research and the available informations about

    the topic of Cannabis cultivation allows that, even

    beginners can identify and discover something new.

     

    These plants are not autos(ruderalis).

    They were not grown in a 12/12 lighting schedule.

    They went into preflower at Node-2.

     

    That last fact of this grow(for me) is one I can not find

    information about, namely, if autoflowers or

    photoperiods have ever gone preflower on the second

    node. The information about preflower just typically

    refers to 4th week and 4th nodes.

     

    If autoflowers don’t do what my plants did, then right

    there, this is something new.

     

    In order to prove my claim, I  am aware that I will have to

    do some of the following

     

    Have tissue from the plant tested for DNA.(where it would

    not have ruderalis)

     

    I would have to grow a plant outside in the soil to also

    show it does not wait to flower and will do so(without

    ruderalis) until fully fruited, but, again the very clear

    preflower at node 2 might be able to prevent that.

     

     

    The video is for December 5

     

    These plants were photoperiod.

    Grown 100% under 18/6.

     

    Even if you think this is a lie, play along. One of the worst

    cannabis growers found something to share with the

    world.

    10-2-4

    Work with me.

    in reply to: Illinois Medical Grower: Frankin-seeds #4788
    names
    Participant

    There is a bit of an update on further researching this occurrence. I had successfully bred two plants(both exhibiting Node-2 preflower and full flower mode), as on January 12th the first sprout of thirty seeds planted was found.

    Since January 12th, there has been many sprouts, but here is the first.

    season 2

    in reply to: Illinois Medical Grower: Frankin-seeds #4786
    names
    Participant

    For now, let’s assume not.

     

    Saying that I was given the first seeds from a heritage grower and I grew a bounty of seeds for a substantial seed stock, and that, I then grew those seeds at length for a multitude of harvests since, and that, I then attempted a second seed harvest that produced this effect, to emphasize the intimate knowledge I have with this photoperiod strain of quality marijuana, needs to be enough for now.

    Definitely of photoperiod sensitivity D.N.A. origins.

    in reply to: Illinois Medical Grower: Frankin-seeds #4737
    names
    Participant

    I mean to emphasize my awareness of the situation. Perhaps a few good questions might help bring more attention to the reality I am claiming.

     

    I am a new grower. You should see what the plant looks like right now. It ran ran out of iron, it had(still has) 3k tds runoff, it was in the soil with a ph so much lower than the color strip on the test strips package that I can only quess it was in the lower 5, it had no overhead light since December 15th, it was fed with a aingle source all purpose fertilizer base of 20.20.20. and it was heavily. heaviliy(heavily)…pollinated.

     

    December 23rd was about the last day it appears in pictured to be of higher-earning condition, and by January 3rd I was racing to try to correct it all.

    1. has anyone ever seen preflower on node 2

    I guess there is only one question worth asking for now.

    puberty

     

    in reply to: Illinois Medical Grower: Frankin-seeds #4735
    names
    Participant

    compatability

    edit:

    The date on this is supposed to be 20’24.

    in reply to: Illinois Medical Grower: Frankin-seeds #4733
    names
    Participant

    So, I know this is going to be hard to accept at first.

    People are going to want to say this plant was flipped to flower, or grown under 12/12 from seed, and that is why it went flower and is so small.

    It is was a seed November 5th.

    Light was 18/6 from that time and all the way into December 23, as shown.

    Both of the plants in this picture were planted November 5th and went directly into flower under 18/6.

    pudding pops

    The one in back on this picture is the one that is shown on December 23rd.

    This grow session was four seeds from the same parent plant and three of them went immediately into flower.

     

    in reply to: Hey Mr. Grow It! #4711
    names
    Participant

    the post has appeared!

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)